Quantum Threat Mitigation in Blockchain AI Architectures

Authors

Keywords:

Quantum Threat Mitigation, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Blockchain AI, Hybrid QKD, Lattice-Based Signatures

Abstract

Blockchain AI architectures stand at the nexus of distributed consensus and machine-driven intelligence, offering transformative applications across finance, supply chain, healthcare, and beyond. However, the emergence of scalable quantum computers threatens foundational cryptographic primitives—most notably, elliptic-curve and RSA-based schemes—that secure transaction integrity, key exchange, and smart-contract execution. This manuscript presents a comprehensive evaluation of quantum threat mitigation strategies tailored for blockchain AI systems. We examine three distinct approaches: (1) adoption of post-quantum cryptographic algorithms (lattice-based signatures and hash-based KEMs) that resist Shor’s algorithm; (2) integration of hybrid quantum-classical key distribution leveraging quantum key distribution (QKD) combined with classical post-quantum algorithms; and (3) deployment of trusted execution environments (TEEs) to isolate critical key operations from both classical and quantum side-channel attacks. Our mixed-methods methodology includes simulation on a 50-node blockchain AI testbed, processing 240,000 transactions over 24 hours, and statistical analysis of throughput, latency, and key-exchange performance. The results demonstrate that lattice-based schemes maintain 128-bit quantum security with a moderate performance overhead (~27 % throughput reduction, ~20 % increased latency), while hybrid QKD delivers information-theoretic security but incurs significant latency penalties (115 % higher than baseline). TEEs effectively mitigate side-channels with negligible additional overhead. We conclude by offering practical guidelines for phased deployment—beginning with immediate migration to lattice-based cryptography, followed by pilot QKD integration for high-security use cases—and outline future research directions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• Aggarwal, D., Brennen, G. K., Lee, T., Santha, M., & Tomamichel, M. (2017). Quantum attacks on Bitcoin, and how to protect against them. Ledger, 3, 68–90.

• Alagic, G., Apon, D., Bellen, R., Benfield, J., Bernstein, D. J., Berbain, C., … & Zhang, L. (2020). Status Report on the Second Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process (NISTIR 8309). National Institute of Standards and Technology.

• Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, 175–179.

• Bernstein, D. J., Buchmann, J., & Dahmen, E. (Eds.). (2009). Post-Quantum Cryptography. Springer.

• Chen, L. K., Jordan, S., Liu, Y. K., Moody, D., Peralta, R., Perlner, R., … & Smith-Turner, R. (2016). Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography (NISTIR 8105). National Institute of Standards and Technology.

• Kiktenko, E. O., Trushechkin, A. S., & Yunusov, R. (2018). Post-quantum security of quantum key distribution. npj Quantum Information, 4(1), 28.

• Liu, F., Chen, M., & Zhang, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence in blockchain security: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 10, 115351–115371.

• Mosca, M. (2018). Cybersecurity in an era with quantum computers: Will we be ready? IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(5), 38–41.

• Rahman, M. H., Shahriar, S., & Hossain, M. S. (2021). Performance evaluation of post-quantum signatures in blockchain. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 58, 102757.

• Sabt, M., Achemlal, M., & Bouabdallah, A. (2015). Trusted execution environment: What it is, and what it is not. In 2015 IEEE Trustcom/ISPA (pp. 57–64). IEEE.

• Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring. In Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (pp. 124–134). IEEE.

• Wang, Y., Li, C., & Liu, J. (2022). An AI-based approach to attack prediction in quantum-resistant blockchain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 129, 291–303.

• Yao, W., Cao, Y., Wan, Z., Yi, P., & Yang, F. (2021). Quantum-safe blockchain: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(4), 2507–2525.

• Zhang, Y., & Lee, W. (2021). Blockchain security: A survey. Computers & Security, 107, 102270.

• Guan, Q. F., et al. (2023). Hybrid quantum-classical AI architectures for secure blockchain consensus. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 180, 12–25.

• Kh urana, V., & Szalachowski, P. (2021). Quantum-safe distributed ledger technologies: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Access, 9, 10023–10038.

• Liu, X., Jiang, P., Chen, T., Luo, X., & Wen, Q. (2020). A survey on the security of blockchain systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 108, 841–865.

• Martin, A., & Shepherd, G. (2020). Quantum internet and secure blockchain: A new paradigm. Proceedings of the IEEE, 108(11), 1870–1893.

• Singh, N., & Kumar, A. (2023). Future directions in quantum-resistant blockchain AI integration. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 212, 103460.

• Kiktenko, E. O., & Nikitin, P. P. (2018). Information-theoretic security in QKD-backed blockchain networks. Quantum Science and Technology, 3(4), 045004.

• Rahman, M. H., & Hossain, M. S. (2021). Comparative analysis of post-quantum KEMs in distributed ledgers. International Journal of Network Security, 23(5), 894–908.

Published

2026-07-04

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Quantum Threat Mitigation in Blockchain AI Architectures. (2026). World Journal of Future Technologies in Computer Science and Engineering, 2(3), Jul (8-14). https://wjftcse.org/index.php/wjftcse/article/view/144

Similar Articles

51-60 of 106

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.