Challenges and Solutions in Implementing Machine Learning for Fraud Detection in High Volume Transactions

Authors

Keywords:

machine learning, fraud detection, class imbalance, concept drift, real-time systems, high-volume transactions

Abstract

The growth of digital payments has produced transaction volumes that make manual and rule-based fraud detection increasingly untenable, driving widespread adoption of machine learning (ML) methods capable of learning complex patterns from historical data. This paper reviews the principal technical and operational challenges associated with implementing machine learning for fraud detection in high-volume transaction environments and synthesizes the solutions proposed in the academic literature. Using a qualitative, literature-based methodology, the paper draws on foundational and recent peer-reviewed research to examine four interrelated challenges: severe class imbalance between fraudulent and legitimate transactions, concept drift arising from evolving fraudster behavior and customer habits, the requirement for real-time or near-real-time inference at scale, and the limited interpretability of high-performing models in a regulated financial context. For each challenge, the paper reviews established and emerging solutions, including resampling and cost-sensitive learning techniques, adaptive and streaming learning strategies, ensemble and graph-based architectures, and interpretability frameworks. The paper concludes that no single algorithmic solution resolves the fraud detection problem in isolation; rather, robust high-volume fraud detection systems require the integrated combination of imbalance-aware learning, drift-adaptive retraining, scalable real-time architecture, and human-interpretable decision support, situated within a broader operational pipeline involving investigator feedback and delayed ground-truth labeling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321-357.

[2] Dal Pozzolo, A., Boracchi, G., Caelen, O., Alippi, C., & Bontempi, G. (2018). Credit card fraud detection: A realistic modeling and a novel learning strategy. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(8), 3784-3797.

[3] Dou, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, L., Deng, Y., Peng, H., & Yu, P. S. (2020). Enhancing graph neural network-based fraud detectors against camouflaged fraudsters. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '20) (pp. 315-324). Association for Computing Machinery.

[4] Kulatilleke, G. K. (2022). Challenges and complexities in machine learning based credit card fraud detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.10943.

[5] Ngai, E. W. T., Hu, Y., Wong, Y. H., Chen, Y., & Sun, X. (2011). The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 559-569.

Published

2026-08-01

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Challenges and Solutions in Implementing Machine Learning for Fraud Detection in High Volume Transactions. (2026). World Journal of Future Technologies in Computer Science and Engineering, 2(3), Aug (13-18). https://wjftcse.org/index.php/wjftcse/article/view/150

Similar Articles

11-20 of 108

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.